Kicksecure as Host

Support
1

Any downside of using Kicksecure as host system compared to Debian for day to day use ( banking ,YouTube, etc)

Untrusted sites, anonymity tasks will done only on VM .

Must be apt torify deactivated to bypass bot flags on explorer?

Can the whole host system trigger bot on email and banking sites and such .

Any downside to use all above on VM instead of Host

Thanks

2

Its a better debian.

3

Not only better .faster and light better performance supports luks 2 on live installer. Debian don’t support Luks2 on its calamares . dunno why .

But not for a beginner as not all works like Debian from scratch

Bluetooth, mount phone etc needs more steps

4

There are no downsides for using Kicksecure as host system compared to Debian for day to day use (banking ,YouTube, etc).

No, websites won’t notice if APT is torified or not.

No.

No. Using VMs is even preferable.

1 Like